Is Nutritional Supplementation Necessary For Healing And Health?Yes!
A well controlled study performed at the Shriners Burn Trauma Center
at the University of Cincinnati Medical School demonstrated conclusively,
that burn trauma victims (children experiencing severe burns over
60% of their bodies) fared far better when given extra nutritional
supplementation over and above the normal "well balanced diet"
generally prescribed by practitioners.(2)100%
of those children receiving the extra supplementation lived, whereas
tragically, 44% died of those children who were given the regular,
traditional, medically and so called nutritionally balanced diet
alone. The scientists stated that, "to our knowledge, this
is the first controlled study to demonstrate what has been suspected
and accepted for some time, that nutritional intervention improves
survival... It may well be that fortification of the diet with still
greater quantities of protein or with selected amino acids may further
improve these variables." (3)
If A Medically Controlled Diet Is Insufficient, What About The
Average American Diet? It's worse! Authorities now agree that
the average American diet no longer provides the needed nutrition
for a foundation of good health.(17) Half
of all foods eaten in America are overly processed convenience foods
known to have little if any nutrient value.(15,16)
Forty percent of middle class American children are severely malnourished,
and adults fare far worse, upwards to 90%.(17)
Both children and adults choose to eat for taste, cost and convenience.
Coffee, white bread and sugar are the most popular, most consumed
foods; adults consume mostly white bread and crackers.(3,4)
Aren't We Assured Of Getting Our Nutritional Needs Met By Getting
All The RDI's? No, not at all! And even if you think you're
getting all your Recommended Daily Intake (RDI's), the RDI's are
really only "guesstimates of unknown reliability" as admitted
by one Harvard Professor who sits on the esteemed blue-ribbon panel
of RDI scientists who originally established and defined for us
the whole concept of RDI's.(10) Moreover,
the RDI board readily admits its values are not meant to create
"optimal health," in that the RDI's are only the suggested
"minimum " or "adequate" daily requirements,
or that which provides for "normal" health in most people,
not the "optimum."(13,14)
So, What Is "Normal" or "Adequate" Anyway?
Most people get confused as to what "normal" or "adequate"
really is, thinking that it means the "best" or "optimal."
But when used scientifically, "normal" or "adequate"
generally defines only that which is statistically "average,"
"common," or what most people experience (as in RDI's
above). Unfortunately, this leads to a lot of possible misinterpretations.
For instance, researchers from the Journal of the American Medical
Association point out that the generally accepted "normal"
or "average" serum cholesterol level in an older adult
male is not healthy at all, rather it is indicative of a high risk
for coronary heart disease.(13) The fact that
this cholesterol level is "normal" only suggests that
this is "what most males experience," obviously not the
"best" or "preferred" levels for optimal health!
Similarly, "normal" or "adequate " with regards
to nutrition does not suggest that such will cause the "best"
or "optimal" health that people can, could or should experience.(17)
Is "Optimal" Supplementation Measurably Better Than
"Normal" or "Adequate" Nutrition? Yes it
is! For some time, scientists have known that most life on this
planet can survive with less than optimal levels of nutritional
intake; it's a blessing inherent in our genes to be able to survive
in times of hardship. But authorities also point out that when an
effort is made to optimize nutrient intake, to provide more than
that which is just adequate, something wonderful happens: life is
significantly better, healthier and longer, and with less disease
and dysfunction.
It's not surprising that a well controlled study in Louisiana(17)
demonstrated that when a sample of pregnant women ate "normally",
they produced "normal" infants who grew into "normal"
children who tested out to be "normal." What was surprising
is that when the diet of these same (21) women
was supplemented with nutrient-rich items, and they in turn became
pregnant again, nursed their infants, and continued to give their
infants that same supplementation program throughout early childhood,
dramatic results occurred! These younger children were significantly
superior to their older brothers and sisters (who hadn't benefited
from additional nutritional supplementation) in every physical,
emotional and intellectual test used to measure their developmental
differences.(17) The conclusion: Above-Normal
nutrition produces Above-Normal children.
But Doesn't Eating The "Right Foods" Ensure Optimal
Nutrition? Not anymore! Even though the ultimate guide to good
eating has generally meant following the nutritional recipe of the
"four food groups," published studies have shown that
consuming a diet from the "four food groups" alone does
not ensure adequate intake of all essential nutrients.(8)
The answer to good health does not lie simply in eating the "right
" foods. And, even if we were capable of supplying only nutrient-rich
foods to our body, there's still a great deal that can go wrong
in trying to extract and absorb these nutrients and still no guarantee
that all would be assimilated.(17,24)
But Isn't The Digestive System Infallible? No! Until recently,
most thought that the process of digestion was foolproof and automatic,
requiring the input of a balanced diet alone to ensure good health.(1:vol
1) But although digestion is "the" chemical and
physical process that the body uses to extract 50 or so critical
nutrients we need for life, while disassembling food into smaller
more usable forms of building materials to repair itself, it's not
altogether "Fail-Safe."(1:vol 1-3,12)
There's no guarantee that all potentially available nutrition will
be assimilated.(1:vol 1-2,12,17)
More and more doctors are coming to realize that the digestive
system is not the infallible "cast iron" mechanism we
first thought it was.(1) Despite a so called
"balanced diet," much of the food ingested is not broken
down far enough in digestion to release the essential nutrients
it contains.(17,24) So, even if people try
to eat right, and maintain a balanced diet, if we're unable to get
at the nutrients locked up within these foods, they'll do us little
if any good. The Bottom Line: We are not benefiting from the foods
that we are eating when most of the nutrients are never fully extracted
from the foods that we ingest!(1:vol1-3,12,17,24)
So, Why Does The Digestive System Break Down? Each part
of the Digestive System must be in prime working order, or the whole
system suffers.(1,12,24) The integrity of
the Digestive System itself relies on there being a constant sufficient
store of appropriate stomach acid levels, a host of protein digesting
amino-enzymes, carbohydrate digesting amino-enzymes, fat digesting
amino-enzymes, as well as amino-vitamin, amino-chelated minerals,
free form amino acids, neurochemicals and neuro-transport mechanisms
to break down foods sufficiently enough to then transport and carry
them throughout the body to where they're needed.(1,12,24)
These chemical mechanisms are used up quickly and continually need
refurbishing, relying upon newly digested foods to provide these
materials.(12,19,20) Without them, further
digestion becomes impaired and a number of malabsorption syndromes
ensue. In other words, the digestive "pump" continually
needs to restock its "primer water" or the pump becomes
increasingly inefficient until it finally stops working altogether.
And the problem is only compounded further when the diet is nutrient
poor to begin with.
What Are The Consequences Of A Faulty Digestive System? The
inability of our dietary intake to be broken down into its constituent
nutrients, and then get to where it's needed within the body, is
a major problem often overlooked in health care. In fact, failure
to extract the nutrients we need during digestion constitutes a
serious form of malnutrition now running epidemic in our society.
Make no mistake about it - the inability to extract and assimilate
nutrients from provided foods (malabsorption) constitutes a form
of malnourishment just as compromising and debilitating as an improper
diet, or slow starvation itself.(19,20) All
have a slow insidious effect, greatly lessening the power of natural
resistance from disease, enfeebling the body and making it a prime
target for illness and early death.(16,17)
Moreover, malnourishment appears to be the leading factor, if not
the major cause of most diseases and illnesses known to man.(6,7,15,16)
As one example among many, in 1992 Dr. Bernadine Healy, the past
(1988-1992) Director of the U.S. National
Institute of Health, claimed that the American diet may directly
contribute to as much as 35% of all cancer deaths and that two-thirds
of ALL DEATHS can be attributed to life-style choices, including
what we eat!(20) Authorities now believe that
malnutrition is the insidious precursor of most modern day illness
and dysfunction including birth defects, coronary heart disease,
allergies, diabetes, cancer, arthritis, osteoporosis, diverticulitis,
kidney stones, gallstones, both mental and neurological disorders
as well as other ailments and immune dysfunction.(6,7,11,16,17,18,19,21)
In fact, reputable studies have recently demonstrated that there
are no disease conditions today for which current medical treatment
has a better chance of success than the best technical medical care
of 1951.(10,17)
|